Loch Ness: What the Evidence Actually Says

2025-03-11 · Mysterious Creatures · 2 min read

It began as a newspaper story. On 2 May 1933 the Inverness Courier reported that a local woman, Aldie Mackay, had seen something large churning the water of Loch Ness while she drove along its shore. An editor reached for the word "monster," and a legend that had simmered in Highland folklore for centuries suddenly had a modern shape. Within months the Daily Mail sent a big-game hunter, Marmaduke Wetherell, to track the beast. He returned with plaster casts of huge footprints, which the Natural History Museum identified as the prints of a dried hippopotamus foot, most likely from an umbrella stand.

That humiliation set up the most famous fake in the loch's history. In April 1934 the Daily Mail published the "surgeon's photograph," a graceful head and neck rising from the water, credited to a respectable London doctor, Robert Kenneth Wilson. For sixty years it stood as the best evidence for Nessie. Then, in 1994, an elderly man named Christian Spurling confessed. His stepfather, Wetherell, had built the monster from a toy submarine bought at Woolworths, topped with a neck of wood putty. The picture was revenge on the newspaper that had mocked him.

Reader comments (0)